Les Miserables, by Victor Hugo, 1862, Book Review

les-miserablesThis is not a book for the faint of heart. It took me scores of hours to read it, and that was with a good deal of skimming. Mr. Hugo has the old-fashioned habit of rabbit-trailing—often for five or six chapters at a time. As soon as he left the storyline, I started clicking my Kindle with the briefest scan of a page. He does a lot of name dropping, a good deal of drifting into politics and histories (particularly French history that I’m not well-versed in), and his commentary on related subjects stretches long. For example, when Jean Valjean must hide in a convent, we get several chapters on the pros, cons, and extensive history of convents. Skip, skip, skip.

The delivery of the main storyline is scattershot, as well. Jean Valjean is our main character, a convict. We don’t meet him, however, until we complete an entire volume written about the priest who serves to change the course of Jean’s life. As a changed man, albeit one hiding from the law under an assumed name, Jean takes up an honest trade, becomes quite wealthy, does good to the poor, and comes in contact with Fantine. Another entire volume is written about this particular woman, who represents the suffering of all women under an unjust and uncaring society. She is a discarded prostitute forced to leave her daughter under the care a cruel family and eventually dies of wretchedness. Jean learns of the woman’s misery and sets out to save the daughter. The remainder of the story revolves around his selfless acts on the daughter’s behalf, despite evil forces that seek to destroy them, and the love that springs up between them (interspersed, of course, among two more volumes about other characters that seem unrelated until they cross paths with Jean). Jean is a good man, a self-sacrificing man, a martyr, a Christ figure.

However long, sidewinding, piecemeal, and—did I say long?—the story may be, the meat of it has been enduring. It makes a number of social statements, foremost, that an unjust and uncaring society causes suffering. Who are “Les Miserables?” All mankind. “Misery has been the garment of the human race,” the author explains in an afterward. The state of women and children (represented by Fantine and by various Parisan street urchins), the protection or lack of protection given to them, is the indicator of a civilization. And society comes up short. Poverty, starvation, and the neglect of children… Monarchies that are oppressive and self-indulgent at the expense of the populace… There is a great deal said about the need for social reforms, such as free and compulsory education which we now take for granted. But the book also draws hope from the promise of heaven, when all will be corrected. Victor Hugo relates some very strong Christian convictions. God, he says at one point, is the main character in his book. Man is the second. Grace and forgiveness are upheld against the strict rule of law.

The storyline of Les Miserables, when you can uncover it, is very powerful. The book gives a unique look at the strengths and weaknesses of nineteen century society. It also takes a hard look at the evil and nobility of mankind. It is well worth reading, and I am very curious to see a modern adaption (movie or stage performance). But I think, for modern readers, an abridged version of the novel might be much easier to digest. I’d give this one a high school age recommendation.

9 thoughts on “Les Miserables, by Victor Hugo, 1862, Book Review

  1. Never picked up the book Les Miserables, as I knew it would be complicated. But have seen it on stage countless times (long) and the recent movie, which I loved. You were brave to tackle Victor Hugo.

    1. It was free for Kindle, so I gave it a whirl. It took me most of November and December. I’ve never seen it performed, though my roommate had the soundtrack in college so I could probably sing all the parts, lol. I want to see the new movie, just haven’t yet.

      1. It will be released in DVD soon. The movie was spectacular. After hearing/watching Anne Hathaway’s raw performance of “I Dreamed a Dream,” I had a new appreciation for the pain and suffering.

  2. I saw a clip of that. My friend and I were waiting for it to come out at the cheap theater, but it still wasn’t there when she was getting too pregnant to sit through it. (She had the baby yesterday.) So we’ll probably have to find the DVD now.

  3. My husband and I saw the play twenty years ago and we were so taken by the story. I have seen it performed a couple of times since and have always been mesmerized. We are looking forward to seeing it on DVD when it comes out. I have yet to read the book due to the time it woudl take me to read it. As you say, the style of writing was much differnt back then. Thanks for the review!

      1. They are both very good. My dear husband likes to give me tickets to these sort of events so I am lucky. Hope you get to see both of these performances soon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s